Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 07:22
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
China extracts critical mineral rubidium from brine for first time - South China Morning Post
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do some men like older women?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear: